# Command R vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 13.8.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 272 | 49 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1543 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1493 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1464 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is Command R or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.