# Command R vs Magistral Small

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Magistral Small leads 38.4 to 29.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 61.3% for Magistral Small.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 272 | 296 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 46.4% | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Magistral Small?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Magistral Small?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

### Is Command R or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Magistral Small share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.