# Command R vs Longcat Flash Chat

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-longcat-flash-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 38.4.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 267 | 121 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1471 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1441 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1454 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1445 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1411 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1425 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)

| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1418 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Longcat Flash Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.