# Command R vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> Command R and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.7 to 28.8.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 268 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1025 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1072 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1060 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1058 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Command R and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command R or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 29.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.