# Command R vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 25.8 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 267 | 326 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 3.2 90B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.