# Command R vs Llama 3.1-70B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-llama-3-1-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 28.0 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 60% for Llama 3.1-70B.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $0.40 for Llama 3.1-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 272 | 308 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1260 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 54.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1241 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 60% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 14.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.92 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1252 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1209 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 80.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1215 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1261 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1253 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1231 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1241 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1232 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Llama 3.1-70B?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1-70B lists at $0.40 and $0.40.

### Is Command R or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 30.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 3.1-70B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.