# Command R vs Llama 2-70B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-70B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 7.4.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 272 | 349 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1079 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1073 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1091 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1039 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 69.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 995 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1090 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1071 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1088 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Llama 2-70B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 2-70B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.