# Command R vs Llama 2-13B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.7 to 26.5.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 272 | 309 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1062 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 42.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1065 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 55.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1045 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1050 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Llama 2-13B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 2-13B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.