# Command R vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.2 to 38.4.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 267 | 63 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1403 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1414 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.