# Command R vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 38.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 272 | 89 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1484 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1443 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1442 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1440 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1449 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1430 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command R | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1427 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.