# Command R vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.9 to 58.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 267 | 213 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1247 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1240 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1251 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1244 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1221 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 89% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1240 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1243 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.