# Command R vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-hunyuan-vision-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.4 to 38.4.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 42.6 |
| Rank | 267 | 95 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1419 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1417 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1383 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1398 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1405 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1389 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1423 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.