# Command R vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-hunyuan-turbos
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 272 | 139 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1361 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1339 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1366 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1387 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.