# Command R vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 272 | 114 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1414 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1395 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Command R | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1393 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.