# Command R vs Granite 4.1 8b

> Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-granite-4-1-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 24.6 to 13.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 36.8 |
| Rank | 267 | 202 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1313 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1190 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1294 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1311 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1310 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1261 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1238 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1268 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1275 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1269 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Granite 4.1 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.