# Command R vs Granite 4.1 8b

> Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-granite-4-1-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 272 | 205 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1312 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1192 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1293 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1312 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1309 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1261 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1269 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1275 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | Command R | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1290 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1251 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1268 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.