# Command R vs GPT-5 Pro

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 157× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gpt-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 13.3.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 267 | 58 |
| Context | 128K | 400K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $120 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.26 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than GPT-5 Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 157× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or GPT-5 Pro?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

### Is Command R or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and GPT-5 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.