# Command R vs GPT-5.3 Chat

> GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gpt-5-3-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 38.2.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 42.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 109 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $1.75 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $14 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1408 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1389 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1397 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1384 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1352 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1371 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1378 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1396 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)

| Benchmark | Command R | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1355 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1412 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1690 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than GPT-5.3 Chat?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or GPT-5.3 Chat?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Is Command R or GPT-5.3 Chat better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and GPT-5.3 Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.