# Command R vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 38.2.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Command R accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 64K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 158 |
| Context | 128K | 64K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1354 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1353 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1311 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | Command R | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1332 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or GLM-4.5V?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

### Is Command R or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command R does, with 128K tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.