# Command R vs Gemma 7B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 7B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.4 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 267 | 295 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1048 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1042 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.74 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1066 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1002 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 66.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 963 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemma 7B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemma 7B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.