# Command R vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 58.8 to 38.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 74.9% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 267 | 88 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.0765 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1446 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1359 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 927.17 |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1438 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 74.9% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 29.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.85 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1469 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 82.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 73.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1260 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1427 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1305 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Is Command R or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.