# Command R vs Gemma 3 27B

> Command R and Gemma 3 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemma-3-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.7 to 38.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Math: 19.4% for Command R and 55.4% for Gemma 3 27B.
- Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- Gemma 3 27B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 267 | 277 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | 39.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1322 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 4.9% |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1340 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | 51.5% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 12.3% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | 50% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.04 |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | 55.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1312 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 22.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 74% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1303 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1165 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1347 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1368 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1348 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | 74.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1321 |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1333 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | 34.6% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1266 |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemma 3 27B?

Command R and Gemma 3 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Is Command R or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

Command R scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3 27B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemma 3 27B share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.