# Command R vs Gemma 3 1B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemma-3-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 7.0.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 21.1 |
| Rank | 272 | 353 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 19.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemma 3 1B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemma 3 1B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.