# Command R vs Gemma 2B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 2B in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.4 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 267 | 305 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1010 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 989 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1009 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 42.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 971 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 945 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemma 2B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Gemma 2B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.8 vs 28.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemma 2B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.