# Command R vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-3-8-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.8 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 13.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 95.7% for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 61.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 11 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.75 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $3.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1510 |
| DeepSWE | — | 73.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 41.2% |
| CursorBench | — | 39.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1584 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 19.6% |
| SciCode | — | 56.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 84.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,270 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 64.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 5.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,094 |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1508 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 95.7% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 52.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 89.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 97.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98.5% |
| CritPt | — | 18.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 61% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 47% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 76.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.71 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1528 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 68.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 22% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1524 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 95.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 44.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 69.7% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 38.6% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 31.7% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1491 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1554 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1498 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1493 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1502 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1515 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1485 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1490 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1508 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1499 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1492 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1501 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1748 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Is Command R or Gemini 3.8 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 3.8 Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50.