# Command R vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

> Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-3-1-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 76.8% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 144 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1400 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1256 |
| SciCode | — | 41.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 797.73 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 37.3% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 76.8% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 35% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8.2% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.47 |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.4 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1428 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 27.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1240 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1424 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1420 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1421 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1394 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1416 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1417 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.

### Is Command R or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.