# Command R vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-2-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 62.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 272 | 211 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1373 |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1377 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 62.8% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 18.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.94 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1373 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1373 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1388 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 81% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1367 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1366 |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Is Command R or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.