# Command R vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.6 to 58.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Math: 19.4% for Command R and 71% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 267 | 171 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | 63.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | 68% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | 65.1% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.