# Command R vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-2-0-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Math: 19.4% for Command R and 58.1% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 194 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | 50.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1324 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | 65.5% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | 54.3% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | 58.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1309 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1305 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1100 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1323 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1339 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1347 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1306 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1301 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1328 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1313 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | 78.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1305 |
| IFEval | — | 82.4% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1320 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1330 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1307 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | 34.3% |
| WildBench | — | 79% |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.