# Command R vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)

> Command R and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-1-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 52.5 to 38.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 59% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 267 | 253 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1294 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 57.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| CadEval | — | 34% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 74.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
| BALROG | — | 21% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1296 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 59% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.73 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.4 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 23.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1279 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 86.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 57.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.4% |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1301 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1310 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 83.7% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1296 |
| WildBench | — | 81.3% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?

Command R and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command R or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.