# Command R vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 28.0 to 9.3.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 27.3 |
| Rank | 272 | 332 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1108 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.04 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1132 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1059 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 70% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1114 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1132 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.