# Command R vs Falcon-180B

> Command R and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.9 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 267 | 254 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1007 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.89 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 70.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)

| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1013 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Falcon-180B?

Command R and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Falcon-180B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.