# Command R vs ERNIE 5.1

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-ernie-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 83 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1481 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1481 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1492 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1508 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1460 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1471 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and ERNIE 5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.