# Command R vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-ernie-5-0
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 38.2.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 272 | 129 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1455 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1445 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1437 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1428 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1249 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1413 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1422 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

| Benchmark | Command R | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1434 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.