# Command R vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-deepseek-v3-2-speciale
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 13.3.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 267 | 159 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.58 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.68 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 46.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 52.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1276 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

### Is Command R or DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3.