# Command R vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-deepseek-llm-67b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 7.0.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 24.9 |
| Rank | 272 | 347 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1096 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1070 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 110.5 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1108 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 24.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1073 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1079 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1092 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1105 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1067 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1082 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.