# Command R+ vs Wizardlm 13b

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.7 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 251 | 272 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1049 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Wizardlm 13b?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.6 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.