# Command R+ vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 43.5.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 257 | 71 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1487 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1474 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1489 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1467 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1478 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.