# Command R+ vs Qwen3-4B

> Command R+ and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-4B leads 19.2 to 9.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 257 | 264 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R+: —
- Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | 5.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Qwen3-4B?

Command R+ and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.