# Command R+ vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 32B leads 20.2 to 9.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 54.9% for Command R+ and 67.5% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Qwen3 32B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 257 | 172 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R+: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1334 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 67.5% |
| LMCA | 5% | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 138.51 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1331 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 32B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Qwen3 32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.