# Command R+ vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R+ leads 28.9 to 16.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 33.8% for Command R+ and 45% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 257 | 297 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 52.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 128.52 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.