# Command R+ vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 27.6 to 8.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 54.9% for Command R+ and 81.1% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 251 | 204 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1328 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 5% | 24% |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1303 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Qwen Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.