# Command R+ vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.7 to 31.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 29.7% for Command R+ and 12.9% for Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 251 | 310 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | 20.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1102 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | 15.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1100 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | 30.3% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | 24% |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | 17.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1151 |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1067 |
| MMLU | 69.4% | 75.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | 1134 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1111 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | 47.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1087 |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1088 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | 12.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Command R+ scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.