# Command R+ vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 41.9% for Command R+ and 48.7% for phi-3-medium 14B.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 257 | 306 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 48.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 121.23 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 78% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and phi-3-medium 14B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.