# Command R+ vs Palm 2

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.7 to 25.7.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 251 | 296 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 995 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1005 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1049 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1010 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 994 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Palm 2?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Palm 2 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.6 vs 28.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.