# Command R+ vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 24.9 to 8.9.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 251 | 182 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1318 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1302 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1315 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1272 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1289 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.