# Command R+ vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 9.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 257 | 131 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1396 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1417 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1386 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1375 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.