# Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 43.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 40.2 |
| Rank | 257 | 152 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 141.35 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1431 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1432 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R+: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1415 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.