# Command R+ vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R+ leads 26.6 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 251 | 326 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R+: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | 125.5 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R+: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 3.2 90B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.