# Command R+ vs Llama 2-70B

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-70B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 54.9% for Command R+ and 41.6% for Llama 2-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 257 | 349 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1079 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1073 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 41.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 113.79 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1091 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1039 |
| MMLU | 69.4% | 69.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 995 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1090 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1071 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1088 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Llama 2-70B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 2-70B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.