# Command R+ vs Llama 2-13B

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 2-13B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 29.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 54.9% for Command R+ and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 257 | 309 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1062 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 42.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 106.17 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1065 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 69.4% | 55.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Command R+: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1045 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1050 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Llama 2-13B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 2-13B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.